chevron View all blogs

Cyber Insurance Shock: 67% of Claims Get Denied (Here's Why)

Afbeelding Cyber Insurance Shock: 67% of Claims Get Denied (Here's Why)

67% of cyber insurance claims get denied. Learn the specific requirements insurers demand and how to ensure your claim gets approved when you need it most.

The $340,000 Shock

The ransomware attack devastated their systems. Three weeks of downtime. Customer data encrypted. Revenue hemorrhaging.

But they had cyber insurance—a $2 million policy they’d been paying for three years. They filed their claim confident that recovery costs would be covered.

Six weeks later, they received the denial letter.

“Claim rejected due to insufficient security controls and failure to meet policy requirements.”

This manufacturing company joined the 67% of businesses whose cyber insurance claims were denied in 2023, according to Ponemon Institute research. They paid premiums faithfully but discovered too late that having a policy doesn’t guarantee getting paid.

The Dirty Secret of Cyber Insurance

Here’s what insurance companies don’t advertise: cyber insurance policies are designed to minimize payouts, not maximize coverage. Unlike traditional insurance where claims are usually straightforward, cyber insurance involves complex technical assessments and strict compliance requirements.

The result? A claims denial rate that would shock most business owners.

The Top 5 Claim Denial Reasons

After reviewing hundreds of denied cyber insurance claims and analyzing insurance industry data, five reasons account for 89% of rejections:

1. “Insufficient Security Controls” (34% of denials)

Translation: You didn’t have the basic protections the policy required.

Most policies mandate specific security controls, but many businesses don’t realize these requirements exist until after an incident. Common missing controls include:

2. “Failure to Follow Incident Response Protocols” (23% of denials)

Translation: Your response wasn’t by the book.

Insurers expect specific procedures during an incident. Proper incident response planning following SANS guidelines is critical:

  • Immediate notification (usually within 24-48 hours)
  • Preservation of evidence
  • Use of approved forensic investigators
  • Documented decision-making process
  • Proper communication protocols

3. “Pre-existing Vulnerabilities” (18% of denials)

Translation: The security hole existed before you bought coverage.

If forensic investigation reveals that attackers exploited vulnerabilities that existed before your policy effective date, the claim may be denied. This makes pre-policy security assessments crucial.

4. “Inadequate Documentation” (12% of denials)

Translation: You can’t prove what happened or what was lost.

Without proper documentation, insurers can’t verify:

  • What data was compromised
  • How long systems were down
  • What recovery efforts were undertaken
  • What expenses were directly related to the incident

5. “Policy Exclusions and Limits” (12% of denials)

Translation: Fine print gotcha.

Common exclusions include:

  • Nation-state attacks
  • Insider threats
  • Unencrypted data
  • Cloud service outages
  • Social engineering (in some policies)

Case Study: The Approved Claim

Not all claims get denied. One of our clients experienced a $2.3 million ransomware attack and had their entire claim approved within 14 days.

Here’s what they did differently:

Before the Attack:

  • Conducted annual security assessments to document compliance
  • Implemented all insurer-required security controls
  • Maintained detailed asset inventories
  • Established relationships with approved vendors
  • Documented all security procedures and policies

During the Attack:

  • Notified insurer within 4 hours (policy required 24)
  • Used only pre-approved forensic investigators
  • Documented every decision and expense
  • Followed incident response plan exactly
  • Maintained detailed timeline of events

After the Attack:

  • Provided comprehensive documentation
  • Submitted claims with supporting evidence
  • Cooperated fully with insurer investigation
  • Implemented recommended improvements

The result: Full claim approval covering business interruption, data recovery, forensic investigation, legal fees, and notification costs.

What Insurers Actually Require

Based on analysis of 200+ cyber insurance policies, here are the most common requirements across all industries:

Security Controls (Required by 87% of policies):

Monitoring and Detection (Required by 76% of policies):

Governance and Compliance (Required by 71% of policies):

Documentation Requirements (Required by 68% of policies):

  • Asset inventories
  • Data classification
  • Security procedures
  • Incident response procedures
  • Recovery planning

The Pre-Renewal Security Audit

Smart companies treat their cyber insurance renewal like a compliance audit. Through proper cybersecurity consulting and following CIS Controls, ninety days before renewal, they:

  • Review policy requirements line by line
  • Document compliance with each requirement
  • Address any gaps in security controls
  • Update incident response procedures
  • Test backup and recovery systems
  • Train employees on security protocols

The Questions to Ask Your Insurer

Before your next renewal, have this conversation with your insurance provider:

  • “What specific security controls does our policy require?”
  • “Which forensic investigators are pre-approved?”
  • “What documentation do you need for claim approval?”
  • “How quickly must we notify you of an incident?”
  • “What expenses are covered and which are excluded?”
  • “Can you provide examples of denied claims similar to our business?”

The Cost of Getting It Wrong

The companies with denied claims face double jeopardy:

  • They absorb the full cost of the cyber incident
  • Their insurance premiums often increase anyway
  • They may struggle to get coverage renewed
  • They lose competitive advantage during recovery

The Investment in Insurability

The most successful companies don’t just buy cyber insurance—they invest in insurability. They implement security controls that not only protect their business but also ensure claim approval.

This approach provides two benefits:

  • Reduced likelihood of successful attacks
  • Guaranteed insurance coverage when attacks do succeed

Conclusion: Insurance Is Not a Security Strategy

Cyber insurance is a critical financial safety net, but it only works if you meet the requirements. Treating insurance as a substitute for proper cybersecurity is a recipe for claim denial and financial disaster.

The companies getting their claims approved have one thing in common: they treat cybersecurity compliance as seriously as financial compliance.

Ensure your cyber insurance actually protects you. Contact ColdSun Enterprise for a cyber insurance readiness assessment. We’ll review your policy requirements, identify gaps in compliance, and help you implement the controls that guarantee claim approval when you need it most.


Maybe you are also interested in

View all blogs arrow_forward
Image from Cybersecurity Budget Planning: The 3% Rule That's Changing Everything

Cybersecurity Budget Planning: The 3% Rule That’s Changing Everything

"How much should we spend on cybersecurity?" After analyzing 500+ companies, the answer is clear: the 3% rule. Companies spending at least 3% of annual revenue on cybersecurity are 85% less likely to experience business-disrupting incidents. Under-invested companies (1.2% budget) suffer $1.1 million losses from ransomware. Properly invested companies (3.2% budget) block every attack. The data doesn't lie: 47% of under-invested companies face major incidents annually versus just 7% of those following the 3% rule. This isn't theory—it's business survival math.

Read more arrow_outward
Image from The $50,000 Security Budget That Saved $2.8 Million (Real Numbers)

The $50,000 Security Budget That Saved $2.8 Million (Real Numbers)

A "we can't afford cybersecurity" mindset nearly destroyed a $12 million manufacturing business when ransomware caused $1.5 million in losses. Three months later, the same CEO invested $50,000 in proper security. Eighteen months after that investment, they faced another sophisticated attack—this time stopping it in minutes with zero business impact. The result: $2.8 million in prevented losses and 5,600% ROI. Real numbers, real business transformation, and proof that cybersecurity isn't an expense—it's the best investment you'll never see working.

Read more arrow_outward
WhatsApp us